The clearest difference is provider choice. Gemini is Google's assistant: you get Google's models, Google's rules, and Google's availability. Scholarly is a multi-provider workspace where the same chat can run on Gemini 3.8 Flash, GPT 5.6 Luna, Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Large 3, GLM 5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, or Muse Spark 1.3, and you can change models mid-conversation when one fits the job better. With seven labs in chat and nine across the creation tools, one provider's policy is never the end of the conversation.
The second difference is what happens after the chat. Gemini's output is an answer, and with Veo, a generated clip. Scholarly's output is a study or training artifact: a narrated, chaptered video lecture built from your onboarding manual, a three-speaker podcast from a research paper, a graded practice exam from lecture notes, or a cited report from a folder of sources. Everything stays grounded in the library you uploaded, with citations back to the source.
On price: Gemini's free tier plus the low-cost Google AI Plus and Pro tiers (see Google's pricing page) make it a very cheap general assistant, and if that is all you need, Gemini is a fine default. Scholarly Premium ($30/mo or $144/yr) and Premium Teams ($35/seat/mo) are for people whose work lives in documents: unlimited multi-provider chat plus weekly creation credits that turn those documents into training and study material.