Some ideas are better seen than listed. A supply curve, a feedback loop, a legal chain of custody, the stages of a sales pipeline - each has a shape, and a sketch of that shape is far easier to recall than a paragraph about it. The Doodles style leans into this: it keeps the background white, keeps the labels sparse, and lets a single character and a visual metaphor carry each idea.
Scholarly's Doodles style is different from generic whiteboard animation tools because you do not write the script or pick the drawings. The AI reads your PDF, notes, or link, writes the narration from that material, and draws the sketches to support it. The transcript lets you check every claim against the source, and the AI chat answers follow-up questions using the same material.
If a lecture does not land the way you hoped, switching the mode and regenerating is often a bigger improvement than rewording the prompt. Try the same chapter in Standard and Doodles and compare - the difference between modes is dramatic, and the hand-drawn version is usually the one you can still picture a week later.
Scholarly has two styles that people call illustrated. They look different, and most of this page is about the first.
Doodles lessons suit training storytelling: turning a compliance policy, an onboarding guide, or a product concept into a narrated, hand-drawn explainer that people actually remember. For the full training workflow, see the AI training video generator. Need shared source libraries, seats, and one bill for the whole company? Explore Scholarly for Teams.
