The clinical reasoning cycle: all eight phases, worked through
Tracy Levett-Jones's eight-phase cycle is the framework almost every Australian nursing degree is built on. Here is what each phase actually asks of you, walked through one patient from handover to reflection — and a way to practise it on your own slides, readings and case studies.
Free to start · No credit card required
The eight phases, in order
Look, collect, process, diagnose, plan, act, evaluate, reflect. That is the shorthand. Here is what each phase is really asking you to do.
Consider the patient situation
Start with the person, not the numbers. Who are they, why are they here, what is the context, and what is already nagging at you before you have measured anything? Describe the situation and notice what stands out.
Collect cues and information
Three separate moves, and students routinely do only one. Review what already exists — handover, notes, charts, earlier assessments. Gather what is new by doing the assessment yourself. Then recall the knowledge you need to make sense of it: physiology, pathophysiology, pharmacology, and the ethics and law of your context.
Process information
The phase where the actual reasoning lives. Interpret the cues against what is normal for this person. Discriminate the relevant from the irrelevant and notice what is missing. Relate cues to one another by clustering the ones that belong together. Infer what follows. Match it against patients you have seen before. Predict what happens if nothing changes.
Identify the problem or issue
Synthesise your facts and inferences into a definitive nursing diagnosis — one sentence that names the problem and the evidence for it. If you cannot say it out loud in a sentence, you have not finished processing.
Establish goals
Say what you want to happen, how you will know it happened, and by when. A goal without a time frame is not a goal, it is a hope, and it gives you nothing to evaluate against later.
Take action
Choose a course of action from the alternatives actually available to you, within your scope of practice. Note that continuing to watch and doing nothing is itself a choice — and one you have to be able to justify.
Evaluate outcomes
Go back and re-measure instead of assuming the intervention worked. The cycle asks a blunt question and you should ask it too: has the situation actually improved? If it has not, you are back around the loop.
Reflect on the process and new learning
What did you learn, and what would you do differently next time? This is the phase that converts a shift into expertise, and it is the first one everybody drops when they are tired.
The cycle is drawn as a circle, starting at the top and moving clockwise. In real practice it is far less tidy than that: nurses combine phases and move back and forth between them before they reach a diagnosis, act, and evaluate. The diagram is a scaffold for your thinking, not a queue you have to stand in.
One patient, all eight phases
Reading the phases takes ten minutes. Seeing them run on an actual patient is what makes them stick. Here is a routine afternoon round on an orthopaedic ward.
Consider the patient situation
Mrs Nguyen is 68, day two after an elective total knee replacement. She has type 2 diabetes and a PCA running for pain. She has been cheerful all week, but at your 1400 round her daughter says, quietly, that she is not herself today. That comment is a cue, and it is the first one you have.
Collect cues and information
Review: handover said an uneventful night, obs stable, wound reviewed and dry. Gather: you take a full set of obs yourself — respiratory rate 24, oxygen saturation 92 per cent on room air, heart rate 104, blood pressure 105/65, temperature 37.9, and she is drowsy and slow to answer you. Recall: what you know about deterioration after joint replacement — venous thromboembolism, atelectasis and chest infection, the respiratory effects of opioids, hypoglycaemia, and sepsis.
Process information
Interpret: a respiratory rate of 24 and a saturation of 92 are abnormal for her, and her heart rate is up on her own baseline. Discriminate: the wound is dry, so wound infection is not the immediate story — the new confusion is the cue that matters most. Relate: cluster the fast breathing, the tachycardia, the low saturation and the altered mental state, because they belong together. Infer: that pattern fits a developing respiratory or septic problem rather than ordinary post-operative tiredness. Match: she is a post-arthroplasty patient, which puts pulmonary embolism firmly on your list. Predict: if nothing changes here, she gets worse.
Identify the problem or issue
Synthesise it into a sentence you could say out loud to a colleague: Mrs Nguyen has impaired gas exchange and signs of clinical deterioration of uncertain cause, evidenced by a respiratory rate of 24, a saturation of 92 per cent on room air, tachycardia, and new-onset confusion. Naming it is what lets you escalate it.
Establish goals
Be specific and put a clock on it: saturation above 95 per cent and respiratory rate below 20, her mental state back to her own baseline, and a medical review within the next thirty minutes. Now you have something you can evaluate against rather than a vague intention to keep an eye on her.
Take action
Sit her upright, apply oxygen and check a blood glucose in line with your local protocol, and do not leave her on her own. Escalate — using ISBAR, and using your facility's rapid-response criteria if she meets them. Then document what you found, what you did, and who you told.
Evaluate outcomes
Come back and re-measure rather than assuming it worked. Has the respiratory rate come down? Is she more alert? Ask the cycle's blunt question: has the situation actually improved? If it has not, escalate again. Escalating twice is not a failure of your reasoning — it is your reasoning working.
Reflect on the process and new learning
The honest reflection here is the near miss. It would have been very easy to write the drowsiness off as the PCA and come back at 1600. What you carry into the next shift is this: new confusion in a post-operative patient is a red flag until proven otherwise, not a side effect to be explained away.
This is an illustration of how the framework moves, not clinical guidance. The patient is invented, and the numbers exist to make the reasoning visible. On placement, follow your own facility's assessment and escalation protocols and stay within your scope of practice.
Practise the cycle on your own material
You do not learn to reason by reading about reasoning. You learn it by running whole scenarios, badly at first, and then checking yourself.
Upload your own unit material
Your lecture slides, unit readings, the case studies your uni set, your own notes, and lecture recordings you have permission to record.
Generate practice, not prose
Flashcards, quizzes, practice scenarios and study notes, all generated from what you uploaded. Scholarly will not write your assignment, and you should not want it to.
Run the cycle, then check yourself
Work a scenario through all eight phases in order — especially the processing phase you want to skip — then check each answer against its citation back to your own material.
Where the cycle actually bites
It looks like common sense on the slide. It is not common sense at the bedside.
First-year students
You meet the cycle in about week two and it looks obvious. It is not: nearly all the difficulty is concentrated in the processing phase, and that is the one that takes years.
Heading into your first prac
On placement the cycle stops being a diagram on a slide and becomes the thing you do at the bedside, at speed, while a preceptor watches and a patient waits.
Case studies and care plans
Markers are looking for whether you moved through the phases or jumped straight from the obs to a diagnosis. Practise the reasoning; do not outsource the writing.
Diploma and enrolled nurse students
The same framework runs through VET nursing programs, applied within a different scope of practice and with different escalation expectations.
A study aid, not an assignment-writing service
Search for the clinical reasoning cycle and a striking proportion of what comes back is essay mills offering to write your case study, your care plan, or your reflective piece for you. Scholarly will not do that, and it is worth being blunt about why. Submitting purchased work is academic misconduct at every Australian university and it puts your place in the course at risk — but the more immediate problem is that it does not work. The entire point of the cycle is to build a habit of thinking that has to run automatically at three in the morning when a patient is deteriorating in front of you, and you cannot outsource a habit. What Scholarly does instead is turn material you already have — your slides, your readings, the case studies your unit set — into flashcards, quizzes, practice scenarios and study notes, so that you can practise applying the cycle yourself and check your answers against your own sources.
Where the cycle came from, and why it is everywhere
The clinical reasoning cycle comes from Tracy Levett-Jones and colleagues, published in Nurse Education Today in 2010 as part of a paper on the five rights of clinical reasoning, and drawing on her own research together with work by Hoffman, Aitken and Duffield. Their definition is worth reading slowly: clinical reasoning is the process by which nurses collect cues, process the information, come to an understanding of a patient problem or situation, plan and implement interventions, evaluate outcomes, and reflect on and learn from the process. Every phase of the diagram is in that sentence. The model has since been taken up across nursing, medical and allied-health curricula well beyond Australia, which is why the same eight-spoke wheel keeps appearing in your lecture slides no matter which unit you are in.
Processing information is the phase everyone skips
If your written work goes straight from a set of observations to a nursing diagnosis in a single leap, you have skipped the reasoning, and your marker will see the gap immediately. Processing is where the work happens: interpreting each cue against what is normal for this particular patient, discriminating the relevant from the noise, noticing what is missing as well as what is present, clustering cues that belong together, inferring what follows, matching the picture against patients you have seen before, and predicting what happens if nobody intervenes. Do that properly and the diagnosis in phase four almost writes itself, because it is only a synthesis of thinking you have already done. Skip it and phase four becomes a guess with a clinical vocabulary. And to clear up a myth students hear often: Australian nursing absolutely does use nursing diagnosis — it sits right there in the middle of the cycle.
Registration in Australia: there is no domestic licensing exam
This confuses a lot of students, so it is worth stating plainly. If you graduate from an NMBA-approved program in Australia, you do not sit a national licensing exam. You finish your degree and apply to Ahpra for registration with the NMBA, and there is no domestic equivalent of the licensing exams used in some other countries. An examination pathway exists only for applicants whose qualification is not an approved or substantially equivalent one, and internationally qualified nurses follow a separate assessment pathway with its own requirements. What Australian programs do demand instead is volume of practice: a heavy clinical placement load, typically around 800 hours across the degree, on top of pharmacology and the drug and dosage calculations that go with it. There is no national drug-calculation test or numeracy benchmark, though individual universities do set their own calculation hurdles, so check what your own uni requires rather than assuming.
How to actually get good at it
Reading the eight phases takes ten minutes; being able to run them under pressure takes months of repetition. The way to build that is to work whole scenarios end to end, out loud or on paper, and then check yourself honestly against your sources — not to reread the diagram again. Take the case studies your unit has already given you and force yourself through all eight phases in order, in writing, including the processing phase you will want to hurry past. Then leave it, come back a few days later, and do another one, because spaced retrieval is what turns a framework you can recite into one you can actually use. Uploading your slides, readings and case studies and generating practice scenarios and quizzes from them is simply a way to have more scenarios to fail at, with every answer cited back to your own material so you can check it rather than trust it.
Registration information on this page was verified against NMBA and Ahpra sources in July 2026. Nursing regulation in Australia has changed materially more than once in recent years, so for anything that actually affects your registration, check the NMBA and Ahpra websites directly. They are the authority; this page is not.
Keep exploring
More for nursing students
Each of these builds from your own material — your lectures, your readings, your notes.
Scholarly for nursing students
How nurses use Scholarly across placement, pharmacology, and the exam block.
Medical terminology flashcards
Turn your own terminology lists and glossaries into cue cards you can drill.
Lecture to flashcards
Upload a lecture recording and get cue cards back, each cited to the moment it came from.
Practice exam generator
Generate new practice questions and scenarios from your own unit material.
AI flashcards
How Scholarly builds cue cards from PDFs, slides, recordings, and your own notes.
SWOTVAC study planner
Plan the class-free week before your uni exams around your placement block and shifts.
Clinical reasoning cycle questions
Will Scholarly write my clinical reasoning cycle assignment?
No. Scholarly will not write your case study, your care plan, or your reflective essay, and you should be wary of the many sites that offer to. Submitting purchased work is academic misconduct at every Australian university, and it also guarantees you never build the habit the cycle exists to build. Scholarly is a study aid: it turns your own slides, readings and case studies into flashcards, quizzes, practice scenarios and study notes so you can practise applying the cycle yourself.
What are the eight phases of the clinical reasoning cycle?
In order: consider the patient situation; collect cues and information; process information; identify the problem or issue; establish goals; take action; evaluate outcomes; and reflect on the process and new learning. It is drawn as a circle starting at the top and running clockwise, but in real practice nurses combine phases and move back and forth between them rather than marching through in a straight line.
Who created the clinical reasoning cycle?
Tracy Levett-Jones, with colleagues, published it in Nurse Education Today in 2010 as part of a paper on the five rights of clinical reasoning, drawing on her research together with work by Hoffman, Aitken and Duffield. It has since been adopted across nursing, medical and allied-health curricula internationally, and it underpins most Australian nursing degrees.
Which phase do students most often get wrong?
Processing information, by a distance. The common failure is to jump straight from a set of observations to a diagnosis, which skips the reasoning entirely. Processing is where you interpret cues against what is normal for that patient, discard the irrelevant, cluster what belongs together, infer, match against past patients, and predict what happens if nobody acts. Do it properly and your diagnosis follows almost automatically.
Does Australian nursing use nursing diagnosis?
Yes. Synthesising your facts and inferences into a definitive nursing diagnosis is phase four of the cycle — it is not an American-only concept, and it is not optional. If you have heard otherwise, that is a myth. The diagnosis is what turns a pile of cues into something you can set a goal against and escalate.
Is there a licensing exam for nurses in Australia?
Not for graduates of an NMBA-approved program. You complete your degree and apply to Ahpra for registration with the NMBA; there is no domestic licensing exam of the kind used in some other countries. An examination pathway applies only where an applicant's qualification is not an approved or substantially equivalent one, and internationally qualified nurses follow a separate assessment pathway. Requirements do change, so treat the NMBA and Ahpra sites as the authority rather than any third-party page, this one included.
Can I use my own case studies and lecture slides?
Yes, and that is precisely the point. Upload the case studies your unit set, your lecture slides, your readings, your notes, or a lecture recording you have permission to record, and Scholarly generates flashcards, quizzes, practice scenarios and study notes from that material — each one cited back to the part of your source it came from, so you can check it rather than take it on trust.
Is what I upload private?
Everything Scholarly makes is built from material you upload yourself. Scholarly is not a note-sharing site. Nothing you upload is published to other students, added to a public library, or made searchable by anyone else — your workspace is yours, and that is the core difference from note-sharing platforms. For the full detail of how Scholarly handles uploaded content, including data use and retention, read our privacy policy.
Practise the cycle, do not outsource it
Upload your slides, readings and case studies. Get flashcards, quizzes and practice scenarios built from your own material, each one cited back to your source.
Free to start · No credit card required